From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 10:05:43 +0800
To: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960924143919.28504B-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Message-ID: <199609242306.RAA23971@InfoWest.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In <Pine.SUN.3.91.960924143919.28504B-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>, on
09/24/96 
   at 03:19 PM, Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> said:

= .On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, attila wrote:

= .> 
= .>         go back to your beloved England and your labour unions
= .			your roots are showing :-) ----^

        REALLY?

= .>         NO, I will not outright reject Jim Bell's "Assassination
= .> Politics."

= .Assasination politics is  impossible to defend from a classical 
= .Liberal/Libertarian position. Bell advocates arbitrary applications
= .of  violence and coercion without restriction. There is no way to
= .justify the  initiation of force without abandoning any pretence of
= .being a  Libertarian (which, to be fair, Bell doesn't claim to be).

        all very true.  but I will defend Jim Bell's rights to propose
    them, even if Bell is more than a few cards short of a full deck.


--
  Politicians are like diapers.
    They both need changing regularly, and for the same reason.