1996-09-24 - Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!]

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Message Hash: eebff57e24f54b440950c27b84fcd347d1a8fd28b699c290fe63c456863b74d2
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960924143919.28504B-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Reply To: <199609241518.JAA08759@InfoWest.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-24 23:21:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 07:21:36 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 07:21:36 +0800
To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Subject: Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!]
In-Reply-To: <199609241518.JAA08759@InfoWest.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960924143919.28504B-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, attila wrote:

> 
>         go back to your beloved England and your labour unions
			your roots are showing :-) ----^

>         NO, I will not outright reject Jim Bell's "Assassination
> Politics."

Assasination politics is  impossible to defend from a classical 
Liberal/Libertarian position. Bell advocates arbitrary applications of 
violence and coercion without restriction. There is no way to justify the 
initiation of force without abandoning any pretence of being a 
Libertarian (which, to be fair, Bell doesn't claim to be).






Thread