From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 12:40:42 +0800
To: Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
Subject: Re: Possible snake oil?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960925154728.17155A-100000@stiletto.acadian.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.960925220253.1227A-100000@anx0918.slip.appstate.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 25 Sep 1996, Phil Fraering wrote:

> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:00:40 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Possible snake oil?
> 

[Acual post deleted]

> 
> ObLegalQuestion:
> 
> Should I have been less coy about the corporation name?
> 
> 

It won't make a difference either way: if he company does care, it takes
all of 10 seconds to prove that the message could have been fakemailed
anyway...

As to whether or not they'd have grounds, no, they wouldn't, assuming you
didn't actually edit the quote, and assuming you didn' (and you didn't)
acually acuse them of anything.  You merely quesioned if they were
correct, and if so, how so... which is perfectly inocent.

 --Deviant
Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself.
		-- Friedrich Nietzsche