1996-09-10 - Re: take the pledge

Header Data

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Message Hash: f198e053327e6ee76b548c862a480e5fd3177c3ab5b27dcc04a307b68246a487
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960909232407.3585A-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <199609080352.VAA15611@InfoWest.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-10 07:39:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 15:39:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 15:39:40 +0800
To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Subject: Re: take the pledge
In-Reply-To: <199609080352.VAA15611@InfoWest.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960909232407.3585A-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Better late than never, I suppose. :)

- r.w.



On Sun, 8 Sep 1996, attila wrote:

>         Alright!   it's a genuine PerryGram!  I'll take the pledge; 
>     I've never been able to answer Sternlight without being 
>     significantly more offensive than usual!
> 
>         attila
> 
>  --
>  one of the few things we all share: 
>    the utter, corrosive contempt for our elected officials.
> 
> 
>     --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In, on 07/19/96 
>    at 12:06 PM, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> said:
> 
> =Subject: take the pledge
> 
> 
> =Look, folks, we all know that 99% of what David Sternlight posts is
> =garbage. Why don't we all pledge not to answer any of his posts, and
> =then he'll go away. If necessary, someone can be appointed to post a
> =weekly "the views expressed by David are junk and we are deliberately
> =not replying to them directly" message.
> 
> =David has plenty of places to argue with the wind. We don't need to
> =add this one.
> 
> =I'd like to ask people to publically pledge that they will not reply
> =to David's messages. This is such a pledge.
> 
> =Perry
> 
> 
> 
> 





Thread