1996-09-08 - Re: take the pledge

Header Data

From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Message Hash: fb60d3b3ab8ddf9e30cc12ccba1588701d028fb5f3f7069639cb5cc9aafdfe91
Message ID: <199609080352.VAA15611@InfoWest.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-08 06:05:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 14:05:13 +0800

Raw message

From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 14:05:13 +0800
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: take the pledge
Message-ID: <199609080352.VAA15611@InfoWest.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


        Alright!   it's a genuine PerryGram!  I'll take the pledge; 
    I've never been able to answer Sternlight without being 
    significantly more offensive than usual!

        attila

 --
 one of the few things we all share: 
   the utter, corrosive contempt for our elected officials.


    --------------------------------------------------------

In, on 07/19/96 
   at 12:06 PM, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> said:

=Subject: take the pledge


=Look, folks, we all know that 99% of what David Sternlight posts is
=garbage. Why don't we all pledge not to answer any of his posts, and
=then he'll go away. If necessary, someone can be appointed to post a
=weekly "the views expressed by David are junk and we are deliberately
=not replying to them directly" message.

=David has plenty of places to argue with the wind. We don't need to
=add this one.

=I'd like to ask people to publically pledge that they will not reply
=to David's messages. This is such a pledge.

=Perry








Thread