1996-10-02 - Re: Can we kill single DES?

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Frank Andrew Stevenson <frank@funcom.no>
Message Hash: 6111d5a70b36899d603efc5bf008be1a652e5ce7d9a5a7b3babba24fb87d03cd
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9610020807.A3935-0100000@netcom22>
Reply To: <199610020527.HAA24482@odin.funcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-02 19:12:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 03:12:25 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 03:12:25 +0800
To: Frank Andrew Stevenson <frank@funcom.no>
Subject: Re: Can we kill single DES?
In-Reply-To: <199610020527.HAA24482@odin.funcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9610020807.A3935-0100000@netcom22>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





On Wed, 2 Oct 1996, Frank Andrew Stevenson wrote:

> DES CRACKING SCREENSAVER
[...]
>the screensaver itself can simply display a rotating globe,
> where the different densities of global usage is given in colour shades, showing
> an inverse sunclock of sorts. I think such a concept might give the DES-cracking
> screensaver a critical mass.

That's a great idea. I belive it would be a powerful incentive.

--Lucky





Thread