1996-10-02 - Re: Can we kill single DES?

Header Data

From: frank@funcom.no (Frank Andrew Stevenson)
To: trei@process.com
Message Hash: 74037f7b5eb8eb6926f5e7b560467ec55299ef9c7e49b7de3cd5b67a95770163
Message ID: <199610020527.HAA24482@odin.funcom.com>
Reply To: <199610012026.NAA28151@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-02 08:56:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:56:44 +0800

Raw message

From: frank@funcom.no (Frank Andrew Stevenson)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:56:44 +0800
To: trei@process.com
Subject: Re: Can we kill single DES?
In-Reply-To: <199610012026.NAA28151@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199610020527.HAA24482@odin.funcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


DES CRACKING SCREENSAVER

Sorry for writing twice, beside wanting to add that I might be able to do some
programming for a worthy cause, I just got a rather good idea to make a
screensaver unique and interesting ( making people want to burn cycles )
Picture this: the user upon installing the program points at his/her location on
a world map. This location is send to the keyserver, which sends back highly
compressed information about where other people are running their
"screensavers", the screensaver itself can simply display a rotating globe,
where the different densities of global usage is given in colour shades, showing
an inverse sunclock of sorts. I think such a concept might give the DES-cracking
screensaver a critical mass.

  frank







Thread