From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Message Hash: 0b276d0d5bb757ea1cedaf08cf9d9b0140af0582221dcddf22f88340ca7485e3
Message ID: <9611151747.AA00864@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: <v02140b05aeb13a70acf4@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-15 18:12:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:12:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:12:33 -0800 (PST)
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Subject: Re: Remailer Abuse Solutions
In-Reply-To: <v02140b05aeb13a70acf4@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <9611151747.AA00864@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Peter Hendrickson writes:
> E-cash, the product licensed by Digicash, offers full payee
> anonymity and would be an ideal candidate.
Actually, the current impelmentation of ecash only offers _payer_ anonynmity
and not payee anonymity. If the payer reveals the blinding factors and/or
coin numbers to the bank then the payee is caught when attempting to deposit.
This on purpose, to prevent scenarios such as the kidnapping one from
actually happening. The solution, of course, is for the payee to generate and
blind the coins and order the payer to have them signed. Money changers are
another option, but require you to trust them.
andrew
Return to November 1996
Return to “ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)”