From: Bryan Reece <reece@taz.nceye.net>
To: ph@netcom.com
Message Hash: 794df553394a34014dd2776ea9f43520048d27d3bec4e86ba6296383eabf7cb3
Message ID: <19961116010422.15952.qmail@taz.nceye.net>
Reply To: <v02140b05aeb13a70acf4@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 01:04:41 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:04:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Bryan Reece <reece@taz.nceye.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:04:41 -0800 (PST)
To: ph@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Abuse Solutions
In-Reply-To: <v02140b05aeb13a70acf4@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <19961116010422.15952.qmail@taz.nceye.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:40:29 -0800
From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
E-cash, the product licensed by Digicash, offers full payee anonymity and
would be an ideal candidate.
ECASH AND PRIVACY
One of the unique features of ecash is payer anonymity. When paying
with ecash the identity of the payer is not revealed
automatically. This way the payer stays in control of information
about himself. During a payment a payer can of course identify
himself, but only when he chooses so.
Ecash offers one-sided anonymity; when clearing a transaction the
payee is identified by the bank.
(according to http://www.digicash.com/ecash/about.html)
But what about Okamoto and Ohta's digital cash scheme published in
Crypto '91? It appears to be fully untraceable and transferable. Of
course, I haven't heard of anyone trying to use this scheme (has it
been broken?)
Return to November 1996
Return to “ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)”