1996-11-16 - Re: [NOISE] aga isn’t on cypherpunks… (and I’m glad)

Header Data

From: “Michael H. Warfield” <mhw@wittsend.com>
To: tfs@adsl-122.cais.com (Tim Scanlon)
Message Hash: 29ecd56862a2dafeec5c1b3b06e9ee76a90b0ec169147c1bd9d864f377577680
Message ID: <m0vOsH2-0000LkC@wittsend.com>
Reply To: <9611161810.AA03185@adsl-122.cais.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 21:29:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 13:29:06 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 13:29:06 -0800 (PST)
To: tfs@adsl-122.cais.com (Tim Scanlon)
Subject: Re: [NOISE] aga isn't on cypherpunks... (and I'm glad)
In-Reply-To: <9611161810.AA03185@adsl-122.cais.com>
Message-ID: <m0vOsH2-0000LkC@wittsend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim Scanlon enscribed thusly:

> all,

> "aga@dhp.com", that 'aga' guy, is NOT subscribed to cypherpunks.

> What has and is going on is that he was blindly Cc'ing cypherpunks
> on everything he wrote that had to do with this... 

> I exchanged some mail with the guy, he didn't understand AT ALL that
> "cypherpunks@toad.com" was a mailing list address. He seemed to think
> that he had to be "subscribed" to the list in order for any traffic
> to goto it.

> When I pointed out to him that this was not the case, his attitude was
> that it was not his fault and that the list was "broken" etc.

> If you havn't figured it out, BELIVE ME, talking to this guy is a
> definative waste of packets.

	I have a suggestion...  How 'bout if everybody on this list dropped
a procmail configuration that mailed aga@dhp.com and postmaster@dhp.com
a copy of every message that originated from aga@dhp.com?  Do you think
he would start to "get it" then?

	:
	: - remainder of message deleted...
	:

	Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!





Thread