From: “Michael H. Warfield” <mhw@wittsend.com>
To: tfs@adsl-122.cais.com (Tim Scanlon)
Message Hash: 29ecd56862a2dafeec5c1b3b06e9ee76a90b0ec169147c1bd9d864f377577680
Message ID: <m0vOsH2-0000LkC@wittsend.com>
Reply To: <9611161810.AA03185@adsl-122.cais.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 21:29:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 13:29:06 -0800 (PST)
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 13:29:06 -0800 (PST)
To: tfs@adsl-122.cais.com (Tim Scanlon)
Subject: Re: [NOISE] aga isn't on cypherpunks... (and I'm glad)
In-Reply-To: <9611161810.AA03185@adsl-122.cais.com>
Message-ID: <m0vOsH2-0000LkC@wittsend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim Scanlon enscribed thusly:
> all,
> "aga@dhp.com", that 'aga' guy, is NOT subscribed to cypherpunks.
> What has and is going on is that he was blindly Cc'ing cypherpunks
> on everything he wrote that had to do with this...
> I exchanged some mail with the guy, he didn't understand AT ALL that
> "cypherpunks@toad.com" was a mailing list address. He seemed to think
> that he had to be "subscribed" to the list in order for any traffic
> to goto it.
> When I pointed out to him that this was not the case, his attitude was
> that it was not his fault and that the list was "broken" etc.
> If you havn't figured it out, BELIVE ME, talking to this guy is a
> definative waste of packets.
I have a suggestion... How 'bout if everybody on this list dropped
a procmail configuration that mailed aga@dhp.com and postmaster@dhp.com
a copy of every message that originated from aga@dhp.com? Do you think
he would start to "get it" then?
:
: - remainder of message deleted...
:
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com
(The Mad Wizard) | (770) 925-8248 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
Return to November 1996
Return to “Tim Scanlon <tfs@adsl-122.cais.com>”