From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
To: Bert-Jaap Koops <E.J.Koops@kub.nl>
Message Hash: 48d5f2b8a95bb78437fe3995e16be5dbf4b22a77b990b54ecedb636534c8ed42
Message ID: <847990496.613504.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-14 17:04:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:04:43 -0800 (PST)
From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:04:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Bert-Jaap Koops <E.J.Koops@kub.nl>
Subject: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
Message-ID: <847990496.613504.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > Also I understand, though there appears to be no available
> > documentation saying as much, that pgp3.0 will not use RSA, nor IDEA,
> > nor MD5, using instead El Gamal for public key encryption and
> > signatures, 3DES (unsure?), and SHA1.
>
> Can someone confirm that PGP3.0 will use ElGamal?
>
I cannot confirm that but I do know 3.0 will be downward compatible
using RSA keys for people using 2.x, I also understand that IDEA will
be the symmetric algorithm though I can`t confirm this.
I know 3.0 uses discrete log cryptography but whether it will be
El Gamal or DH or other I don`t know. I would imagine in the end it
would come down to a question of what is unpatented first and I have
no idea on the patent date for El Gamal (is it even patented?) but DH
hasn`t long to go....
Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to November 1996
Return to “paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk”