paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk (292 posts)
Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.
Threads
RE: Desubscribe
- 1996-09-01 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 20:13:50 +0800) - RE: Desubscribe - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Encryption
- 1996-09-01 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 20:26:23 +0800) - Re: Encryption - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
anon.penet.fi: URGENT REQUEST
New cryptography www site
Re: Free Speech and List Topics
Re: desubscribe
- 1996-09-05 (Thu, 5 Sep 1996 13:34:13 +0800) - Re: desubscribe - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
SNAKEOIL ALLERT: FUCKHEAD ;-)
Re: Pseudocrypto detector is going wild
No Subject
- 1996-09-05 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 03:53:32 +0800) - No Subject - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: their is a new mailing list
Re: Voting Monarchist?
Cypherpunk meeting?
Re: /\/\/\/\/HELP\/\/\/\/\ !!!!!!!!!
Re: What the NSA is patenting
Re: talker
- 1996-09-12 (Thu, 12 Sep 1996 10:04:05 +0800) - Re: talker - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Ban CU Secrecy, Keep TLA’s!
Re: … subversive leftists
Re: forward secrecy in mixmaster
Re: Cypherpunks
- 1996-09-15 (Mon, 16 Sep 1996 00:11:01 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: “Remailers can’t afford to be choosy”
Diffie Hellman - logs in Galois fields
Redundancy in XOR encryption
Re: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.
CU foward post, netcopped again!
Re: Diffie Hellman - logs in Galois fields
Re: Redundancy in XOR encryption
Re: IBM_gak
- 1996-09-19 (Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:37:57 +0800) - Re: IBM_gak - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
OTP seed solution? - strong, tried before???
Factoring technique, faster than trial division?
Possible subs attack????
Re: [CRYPTO] (was: sig/noise ratio)
Re: Mousepad RNG’s?
Re: Mousepad RNG’s?
- 1996-09-29 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 03:01:15 +0800) - Re: Mousepad RNG’s? - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:34:24 +0800) - Re: Mousepad RNG’s? - “Philip L. Karlton” <karlton@netscape.com>
[ADVICE] Dimitri Vilus`s personal attacks
Re: DESCrack keyspace partitioning
Re: The Right to Keep and Bear Crypto
Re: This list is a joke
BBS generator
- 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:21:37 -0700 (PDT)) - BBS generator - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 15:23:04 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: BBS generator - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Re: Missionaries (was: “Mormon Asshole?” re: GAK)
Re: Londinium
- 1996-10-11 (Fri, 11 Oct 1996 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Londinium - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: OTP
- 1996-10-21 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 08:31:15 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: OTP - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1996-10-22 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:02:10 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: OTP - “gweissman@spyrus.com” <gweissman@spyrus.com>
- 1996-10-22 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 20:20:11 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: OTP - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Re: [crypto-philo]OTP or DES?
Re: Question: OTP
- 1996-10-21 (Mon, 21 Oct 1996 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Question: OTP - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Q.E.D. reply to petty MESSger (fwd)
Re: Apologies and Clarifications -
IPG algorithm - timing attack
Re: Apologies and Clarifications -
Re: Q.E.D. reply to Perry Metzger
Re: Random numbers for DES search.
Re: Finally – A crypto question from me…HD encryption
Re: Recruiting machines for DES key recovery
Re: Thank you, John Gilmore, for protecting freedom of spee
Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more
Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more
Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
- 1996-11-14 (Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:04:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1996-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:32:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal - Dave Del Torto <ddt@pgp.com>
Re: Q.E.D |= Montgolfiering + Inbongis + Fermented Pear Juice
1996-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 07:38:57 -0800 (PST)) - [Re: Q.E.D | = Montgolfiering + Inbongis + Fermented Pear Juice](/archive/1996/11/b3b7aa241f88c3104103ac7bc922bec74c8c0079a7b19bb33ed843338c03150a) - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk |
1996-11-23 (Sat, 23 Nov 1996 00:51:59 -0800 (PST)) - [Q.E.D | = Montgolfiering + Inbongis + Fermented Pear Juice + AGA](/archive/1996/11/30cf2ce1fec132ea27266920cb5746efac2f2428abb3b3b98eb91cff87115133) - wichita@cyberstation.net |
1996-11-23 (Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:49:15 -0800 (PST)) - [Re: Q.E.D | = Montgolfiering + Inbongis + Fermented Pear Juice + AGA](/archive/1996/11/40c66a26a5b45b370f724edd6fc0de8ae95010ece991d71456536b33eb3ac651) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li> |
1996-11-23 (Sat, 23 Nov 1996 08:19:43 -0800 (PST)) - [Re: Q.E.D | = Montgolfiering + Inbongis + Fermented Pear Juice + AGA](/archive/1996/11/ccf1e9457032f70fa28cd5dd1b7328b46d82d2e1a1367f8fdf92ac00391e1613) - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com> |
Re: The Key for the IPG 200 Megabytes at NETPRIVACY.COM
Re: Members of Parliament Problem
Re: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly N
Re: Members of Parliament Problem
Playing card cryptosystems
Re: [NOISE] aga isn’t on cypherpunks… (and I’m glad)
Re:
- 1996-11-19 (Tue, 19 Nov 1996 09:21:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Aga the homophobic redneck son of a bitch
Re: Fuck You Dumb Cunt
Re: Fuck You Dumb Cunt
Re: The Limey PUNK needs TERMINATED
Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
(Fwd) New Mersenne Prime!
Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
Re: Counterproductive Dorothy Denning Flames
Re: Re[2]: Sound card as a random number source ??
Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: Intellectual dishonesty
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: What’s a “fingerprint” ?
Re: “Family Channel” of the Internet?
Re: take me off the list
RE: Securing ActiveX.
- 1996-12-20 (Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:39:15 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Securing ActiveX. - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1996-12-21 (Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:10:18 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Securing ActiveX. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Re: Armenians (was Securing ActiveX)
Re: Secret-Sharing Algorithm
Re: Anonymous Post Control
Re: Anonymous Post Control
Re:
- 1997-01-10 (Fri, 10 Jan 1997 09:55:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?
Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
Re: encryption program
Re: encryption program
- 1997-01-13 (Mon, 13 Jan 1997 09:35:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: encryption program - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1997-01-13 (Mon, 13 Jan 1997 09:42:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: encryption program - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Re: ok, htf do I get off this list?
Re: another idea?
- 1997-01-14 (Tue, 14 Jan 1997 11:00:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: another idea? - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1997-01-15 (Tue, 14 Jan 1997 17:46:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: another idea? - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
Re: Newt’s phone calls
Re: Numbers we cannot talk about
Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
Re: Numbers we cannot talk about
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: OTP security
- 1997-01-27 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 15:44:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: OTP security - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: OTP security
- 1997-01-28 (Mon, 27 Jan 1997 17:02:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: OTP security - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: OTP security
- 1997-01-30 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 07:56:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: OTP security - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Re: Cats Out of Bags
Re: Cocksucker
- 1997-02-01 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 00:49:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cocksucker - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1997-02-01 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 01:21:46 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cocksucker - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Re: Key Security Question
Re: Key Security Question
Re: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List”
Re: About: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List
Re: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List”
Re: About: My Departure, Moderation, and “Ownership of the List
Re: Moderation, Tim, Sandy, me, etc. * Strong crypto == DES?!
Re: Moderation, Tim, Sandy, me, etc. * Strong crypto == DES?!
Re: unimbibing
- 1997-02-08 (Sat, 8 Feb 1997 02:49:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: unimbibing - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: unimbibing
- 1997-02-08 (Sat, 8 Feb 1997 07:56:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: unimbibing - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
List censorship
- 1997-02-08 (Sat, 8 Feb 1997 09:36:38 -0800 (PST)) - List censorship - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: POST: The Frightening Dangers of Moderation
Re: POST: The Frightening Dangers of Moderation
Re: Moderation experiment almost over; “put up or shut up”
Re: New group
- 1997-02-12 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:04:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New group - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1997-02-13 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:57:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New group - Jeremiah A Blatz <jer+@andrew.cmu.edu>
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
alt.cypherpunks is born.
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
alt.cypherpunks is born.
Re: New group
- 1997-02-12 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 13:56:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New group - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Spam posts from my acct.
Re: John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
Re: Network of majordomos
Re: John Gilmore the fascist cocksucker
Spam posts from my acct.
Re: Network of majordomos
Re: Cypherpunks-announce? Do we need to recreate this?
Re: Cypherpunks-announce? Do we need to recreate this?
Re: You guys/gals oughta get a kick outta this guy
Re: Recommendation: Creation of “alt.cypherpunks”
Re: alt.cypherpunks
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 03:26:23 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: alt.cypherpunks
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 03:28:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: You guys/gals oughta get a kick outta this guy
Re: alt.cypherpunks
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 07:11:20 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: alt.cypherpunks
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 07:11:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: alt.cypherpunks
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 07:13:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re:
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 11:20:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:19:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - “Omegaman” <omega@bigeasy.com>
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:20:14 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - “Cynthia H. Brown” <cynthb@sonetis.com>
- 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 20:46:21 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - “Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law” <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Re: Fuck UseNet
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 11:27:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fuck UseNet - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Moderation experiment almost over; “put up or shut up”
Re:
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 15:41:14 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Moderation experiment almost over; “put up or shut up”
Re: Fuck UseNet
- 1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 15:43:04 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fuck UseNet - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
- 1997-02-15 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 18:02:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fuck UseNet - Bryan Reece <reece@taz.nceye.net>
Re: Moderation experiment almost over; “put up or shut up”
Re: Moderation experiment almost over; “put up or shut up”
Re:
- 1997-02-16 (Sun, 16 Feb 1997 05:58:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re:
- 1997-02-16 (Sun, 16 Feb 1997 07:26:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: (fwd) DES challenge organisation
Re: Anyone have the complete info on CP list alternatives?
Re: Anyone have the complete info on CP list alternatives?
Re: Master of fellatio
Re: encrypt_1.html
- 1997-03-21 (Fri, 21 Mar 1997 10:08:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: encrypt_1.html - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Re: Blanc Weber / Positivist Schill
Re: “…markets are fundamentally chaotic, not efficient”?