From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:32:22 -0800 (PST)
To: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
In-Reply-To: <199701282106.NAA01621@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199701290550.XAA02789@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Paul said:
> The list has been disentigrating for some time since the disgusting 
> incident when Dimitri was forcibly unsubscribed from the list. There 

    Bullshit. This list was disentigrating well before that, and Vulis's 
actions were a part of that disentigration.

> > a while."
> 
> So, there would be no intellectual dishonesty in a country claiming 
> to be a free and open society "trying out" fascism for a month or 
> two? - After all it`s a private country just as this is a private 
> list....

    As long as they let people leave at any point in the experiment, 
comment on the experiment, and start their own country if they don't like it. 

> There is a clear trend easily observable on the list whereby certain 
> members postings are censored when their content is of a standard 
> that, if the moderation were objective and based on content alone, 
> would warrant their being sent to the censored list.

     Really? Point to this "trend". I only know of 2 articles, and 
Sandy explained his (IMNTBHO incorrect) reasoning behind that.