From: AIDAS <aidas@ixsrs4.ix.netcom.com>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 5f75fdd3173287ad50e7a13ca4dd039473ee5fe323351fa9a6869cb826fa9652
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970118185614.8868B-100000@ixsrs4.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <51Rq1D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-19 00:58:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 16:58:29 -0800 (PST)
From: AIDAS <aidas@ixsrs4.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 16:58:29 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
In-Reply-To: <51Rq1D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970118185614.8868B-100000@ixsrs4.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> At that time most valuable contributors to this list (such as myself)
> resolved not to contribute crypto-relevant content to a censored forum.
A decision to which you have definately stuck.
> > Personally, I wish they'd hurry up. I'm getting rather annoyed with the
> > spam, the "you're all homosexuals" postings, the posts by morons that
> > can't figure out Majordomo or their mailers, and so on and so forth.
>
> Not sure about "all", but someone whose name sounds like AIDS, and who
> advocates censorship, most likely is one.
Non sequitor.
> > So I ask you this: If the moderation isn't yet implemented, then how has
> > it "gone down sharply since the start of the censorship [which hasn't been
> > done yet]?"
>
> The way Sandfart has gone down on Gilmore or the way Gilmore has gone
> down on Inman? Or the way "copyright violations" (formerly known as
> "news spam") will not be sent to a censored forum?
Non sequitor.
> > <sarcasm> I just can't wait to see what kind of witty comment Dimitri will
> > have on the first and second paragraphs of my response. </sarcasm>
>
> You're not worth a witty comment, 'punk.
Or you're not capable of providing one. I think you reached your wit's end
a long time past.
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”