1997-01-18 - Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5cd08db987944a7f5d1d052de107a99e406a638c17cd250744bbbff82b657e5b
Message ID: <Jskq1D8w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <853575672.913152.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-18 18:52:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 10:52:29 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 10:52:29 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IMDMP: SOURCE CODE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT
In-Reply-To: <853575672.913152.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Jskq1D8w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk writes:

> > > I suppose you want a special censored list where everyone who uses
> > > the word "fuck" in relation to your good self or any other member of
> > > this list you agree with has their posting cut?
> >
> > No, I don't want censored anything. "Cypher punks" have degenerated into
> > a moderated forum where those who dare criticize His Royal Majesty John
> > the Cocksucker and his court are forcibly unsubscribed, while all sorts
> > of vile insults directed at John's many "enemies" are encouraged.
>
> I quite agree, there is something most definitely wrong with this
> whole situation, still, at least there are some crypto-relevant
> people on the "cryptography" mailing list. cypherpunks still has worthwhile
> nuggets on it but I must say the list has gone downhill sharply since
> the start of the censorship.

I quite agree - a number of people stopped posting in protest when Cocksucker
Gilmore unsubscribed me because he didn't like the content of my articles.

Of course Paul "brute force attack on one-time pad" Bradley was one of the
pro-censorship goons who asked John to "remove" me from the mailing list.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread