From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 17:46:22 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: another idea?
In-Reply-To: <853262592.523172.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970114204550.1313B-100000@eclipse.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk wrote:

> Am I to presume that we will be putting something in the "welcome to 
> cypherpunks" message people get when they join to tell them how to 
> subscribe to the uncensored list?

- From the "welcome message":

I. Administrivia (please read, boring though it may be)

The cypherpunks list is one of three lists discussing
cryptography, privacy, and social issues relating to them.  The three
lists are:

	cypherpunks		moderated to suppress spam and flames
	cypherpunks-unedited	all submissions, just as they arrived
	cypherpunks-flames	the submissions that didn't pass moderation

All of these lists are high-volume mailing lists.  

> or are we going to have  
> yet more censorship on this list which is rapidly degenerating 
> into a playground of illuminati and elite censors???

This list is rapidly degenerating into something, but it's not "a playground of
illuminati and elite censors".


Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMtw32CzIPc7jvyFpAQFU0wf9H77cGP3nfVfogGqy3r+PHxOVVmpivLbK
0d8b/5ay7H6KGpvivXdV+YwqVLu75hLm59H7zPZBb0387R8T/cISg3AznP5F1upP
IJDA36ebKWIIHOcLMOkwAIkQq8yI/xWCtvp4DInoC2VL4HbzFcjQbLaO6+up3KDK
mNLslx6vWFtNGzGbxvOrMvyfm/2UJseYLnvkm0YOWmpdLqJiakEh1FED2UbWhHig
KpJq1XLyjaT7ahEscN2oo6iWglOWikXRatFHGipqCgpNLqjA8uSaHifvO/dtAP09
Xy1z+hax0lnEiid0izqaCFpcr1jhEB89Ylk/iYgBAeZB+3UzvZVXow==
=kJwv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----