From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 96a21f7d5158f73d9c64e3d76fd73966fa981de2547e9de85c560ee8d6507e81
Message ID: <854274612.916192.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-26 10:39:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 02:39:13 -0800 (PST)
From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 02:39:13 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Message-ID: <854274612.916192.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > > My perfectly crypto-relevant article regarding possible attacks
> > > on human relationships with the use of forged mail and anonymous
> > > remailers, has been tossed out (sorted) into cypherpunks-flames
> > > mailing list.
> >
> > I don`t think I read the article (even though I subscribe to the
> > unmoderated list), can you forward me a copy.
> > As I understand it though, from other comentaries, it was junked
> > because it was in response to a message by Dimitri who, given that it
> > is Sandy that is moderating the list, is no doubt filtered by
> > different criteria than anyone else on the list, in my opinion a
> > censorous and fascist restraint as Dimitri has recently been posting
> > more crypto relevant material, besides which whatever the content of
> > his posts they should be open to review before a decision is made on
> > if they are to be junked or not.
>
> Has Paul reversed his previous pro-censorship stand and decided to
> learn something about crypto from people who actually know some?
There is no change of stance needed, I happen to believe you are
knowledgable about cryptography and sometimes post worthwhile
commentary and information, however, you also post a lot of dreck and
flammable material which means I respond in kind. That does not mean
I believe you, or anyone else, should be censored.
> > > Sandy also states rather plainly that crypto-relevance is not the
> > > criterion by which he moderates this list. I question this policy.
> >
> > Yes Sandy, please enlighten us, what is the criterion you use to
> > moderate the list if not crypto-relevancy. I suspect an element of
> > self preservation and protection of the list fuhrer and diktat maker
> > John Gilmore (who, until the disgraceful incident with Dimitri
> > commanded some respect on this list).
>
> I used to respect Gilmore until this series of incidents (unsubscribing
> me, turning list moderated). Now I only have disdain for him.
I agree entirely, Gilmore was a respected man (despite the EFF being
a corporate whore) who threw any respect and admiration others had
for him away.
> > > I would like to hear your opinions as to whether such policies satisfy
> > > the current readership.
> >
> > I don`t think this is the point, John Gilmore is free to appoint
> > whoever he wants to moderate his list, he is free to censor all
> > messages which criticise him and his censorship, however, subscribers
> > to the list should be told they are being censored on these grounds
> > and not on some facade of "crypto relevancy" or another thin veil
> > drawn weakly over content based censorship to protect a certain class
> > of list members.
>
> Quite a few people have expressed interest in re-creating an unmoderated
> cypherpunks list at another site if Gilmore decided to stick to his
> "moderation experiment".
I notice and appreciate the quotes around "moderation experiment",
this is, without doubt, a permenant measure to silence members of the
list who dare to offer criticism of anyone an element of {x: x a
friend or co-censor of John Gilmore}
I do not have the resources to run such an unmoderated list but I
hope someone on this list does and is good enough to start such a
list, cypherpunks is a shell of what it once was.
Also, please note this message will be junked onto cypherpunks-flames
even though it contains no flames or flame bait because it dares to
criticise the censorship of the list (once again Sandy, I give you an
opportunity to prove me wrong).
Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to January 1997
Return to “paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk”
1997-01-26 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 02:39:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk