1996-11-07 - Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 1d39c835ac7cc41f91037b3431e5eb261a40864cd970aeddff5fee7284d34008
Message ID: <3281FD52.74E9@gte.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961106085914.3111A-100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-07 15:25:53 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 07:25:53 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 07:25:53 -0800 (PST)
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961106085914.3111A-100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <3281FD52.74E9@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 1996, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > Actually I think that this view is at the core of the misunderstanding.
> > In fact, we ARE required to suffer fools.

> What you mean WE, white man?  Does this "requirement" include
> John Gilmore?  Must he and his machine be held in hostage to
> the gratuitous flames of Dimitri?  I think not.

> > It is a clear and acknowledged expense for an open society.

> Clear and acknowledged by whom?  Certainly not me.  We are not
> talking about Dimitri's right to speak in open society.  This is
> a private list provided through the generosity of one person.

Sandy is suggesting (demanding?) that all cypherpunks subscribers "accept" without
question or proof John's generosity, i.e., the existence of the list being prima
facie evidence of same.

Well, Sandy, if this were a list sharing cookie recipes or some such thing, I'd grant
you the point, but it's not.  It's a list which would necessarily be watched closely
by neo-government factions such as NSA, and *quite* possibly be a trolling operation.

Please don't come back with the "so why are you here?" argument - after all, I have
my reasons, just like you.






Thread