From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
To: “Cynthia H. Brown” <cynthb@sonetis.com>
Message Hash: 5fd7753b35180c9e3a46445ced34a3fef76f938e97c4541b2a291a9d81bac0da
Message ID: <199702141511.HAA07633@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-14 15:11:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 07:11:20 -0800 (PST)
From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 07:11:20 -0800 (PST)
To: "Cynthia H. Brown" <cynthb@sonetis.com>
Subject: Re: alt.cypherpunks
Message-ID: <199702141511.HAA07633@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > alt.cypherpunks has been newgroup'ed, and I belive rm'grouped. Smart,
> > consiencous newsadmins probably did not honor the rmgroup, as
> > alt.cypherpunks should be acceptable, but most newsadmins are too
> > overworked to actually look at most of the crap that comes through.
> > For example, it hasn't received any messages on my news server,
> > probably because the one upstream removed it.
>
> Seems I'm getting alt.cypherpunks.announce (empty), but not
> alt.cypherpunks or any of the others that show up as newgroup'ed on
> Deja News... Are they alive and well elsewhere?
All of the groups have showed up at news.demon.co.uk (not suprisingly
since I grouped them) and I haven`t seen any cancels. I was sent a
message by some net.scum about him nearly rmgrouping
alt.cypherpunks.announce because it was unmoderated but he got a
stern "cypherpunk" talking to for that ;-)
Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to February 1997
Return to “paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk”
1997-02-14 (Fri, 14 Feb 1997 07:11:20 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk