1997-01-27 - Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

Header Data

From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
To: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Message Hash: 1744c28e27c7f1911f9ca48c372e09ce7688d7bfa2a9fff7c5a232ed7ffa0b4b
Message ID: <854378750.95280.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 15:29:41 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 07:29:41 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 07:29:41 -0800 (PST)
To: paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
Message-ID: <854378750.95280.0@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> From:          paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
> To:            "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
> Date:          Sat, 25 Jan 1997 19:12:05 +0000
> Subject:       Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
> Cc:            cypherpunks@toad.com
> Priority:      normal

Can anyone tell me if my previous message with the above headers (end
of message quoted in below) was sent to the censored list or to 
cypherpunks-flames? - I subscribe to the unmoderated version of the 
list so do not get to see what goes where....

> I do not have the resources to run such an unmoderated list but I 
> hope someone on this list does and is good enough to start such a 
> list, cypherpunks is a shell of what it once was. 
> 
> Also, please note this message will be junked onto cypherpunks-flames 
> even though it contains no flames or flame bait because it dares to 
> criticise the censorship of the list (once again Sandy, I give you an 
> opportunity to prove me wrong).


 
 

  Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"





Thread