1996-11-14 - Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: 7b35db591b2ac936c5bd35daa5d69da62d3f88c37886259e85ad18bb0b2ea875
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9611131930.A5464-0100000@netcom14>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961113200754.4470C-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-14 03:43:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 19:43:58 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 19:43:58 -0800 (PST)
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961113200754.4470C-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9611131930.A5464-0100000@netcom14>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > The PGP 3.0 code that I've been working on has support for:
> > 	IDEA, 3DES
> > 	MD5, SHA1
> > 	RSA, DSS, ElGamal
> > 
> > It does not discontinue support for the PGP 2.6.2 algorithms.  It adds
> > support for new ones.
> 
> Absolutely outstanding.

I agree. Support for soon to be patent free algrithms is a good thing. I 
hope that in version 4.0, after the users had time to migrate to 
DSS/ElGamal, PGP will fully move away from RSA.

--Lucky





Thread