1996-11-14 - Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c2a240f8b0b1856f4ad39763522f90d5203b2777499d19fc98ceeea7d3d860cb
Message ID: <v03007813aeb0506ae6a3@[206.119.69.46]>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961113200754.4470C-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-14 04:30:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 20:30:40 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 20:30:40 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961113200754.4470C-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <v03007813aeb0506ae6a3@[206.119.69.46]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:43 pm -0500 11/13/96, Lucky Green wrote:
>I agree. Support for soon to be patent free algrithms is a good thing. I
>hope that in version 4.0, after the users had time to migrate to
>DSS/ElGamal, PGP will fully move away from RSA.

Speaking of patent-free, :-), can you do blind signatures without RSA?

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga

-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson
The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/







Thread