1996-11-18 - Re: Does John Gilmore…

Header Data

From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: f72f53f26facd473f0b1229e6ae5b35d293712a910332578163df2c4aff3c93d
Message ID: <199611182130.NAA08518@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-18 21:31:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:31:06 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:31:06 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Does John Gilmore...
Message-ID: <199611182130.NAA08518@kachina.jetcafe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Black Unicorn writes:
> Dave Hayes writesL:
> > [For those who's assumptions rule their perception: I am *not* arguing
> > that all speech should be subsidized. I am merely pointing out that
> > the organization that is spending the money to broadcast is
> > controlling the speech, hence it is *not* free speech in terms of
> > freedom or cost.]
> Again, you confuse free speech with free broadcast.

Isn't broadcast a subset of speech, especially in this culture?
------
Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org 
Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet

The penalty for laughing in a courtroom is six months in jail; if it were 
not for this penalty, the jury would never hear the evidence.







Thread