cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-12-04 - Re: The Rise and Fall of Cypherpunks WAS [Re: the Dennings]

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Message Hash: 1125eda8e30a2966f67f6b84e7b9505d2e32b0f3bf095af41a4e59d4bf071f80
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961203233536.10915A-100000@crl11.crl.com>
Reply To: <199612040600.WAA16892@kachina.jetcafe.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-04 07:55:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 23:55:25 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 23:55:25 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Subject: Re: The Rise and Fall of Cypherpunks WAS [Re: the Dennings]
In-Reply-To: <199612040600.WAA16892@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961203233536.10915A-100000@crl11.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Dave Hayes wrote:
> The very existance of the "profane" keeps the "sacred" in
> existance as well. If you cannot see that, then John Grubor's
> lesson is wasted on you.

If this bit of verbal legerdemain makes any sense at all 
(Logos?), then Grubor must be personally responsible for the
existance of every saint on the Catholic calendar...not.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thread