1996-12-04 - Re: The Rise and Fall of Cypherpunks WAS [Re: the Dennings]

Header Data

From: Stephen Boursy <boursy@earthlink.net>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: 96ede8f8294de3949e84cc589c9f1feed5a800e2b5de7c049c883239f6cb2e23
Message ID: <32A579A8.718@earthlink.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961203233536.10915A-100000@crl11.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-04 13:12:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 05:12:53 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Stephen Boursy <boursy@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 05:12:53 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: The Rise and Fall of Cypherpunks WAS [Re: the Dennings]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961203233536.10915A-100000@crl11.crl.com>
Message-ID: <32A579A8.718@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> 
> C'punks,
> 
> On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Dave Hayes wrote:
>
>> The very existance of the "profane" keeps the "sacred" in
>> existance as well. If you cannot see that, then John Grubor's
>> lesson is wasted on you.
> 
> If this bit of verbal legerdemain makes any sense at all
> (Logos?), then Grubor must be personally responsible for the
> existance of every saint on the Catholic calendar...not.


  Well saints come on go on the Roman Catholic calander--doesn't
mean a hell of a lot.

  Dr. Grubor does an excellent job of bring the vermin out of
the woodwork.

                        Steve





Thread