1996-12-03 - Re: denial of service and government rights

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: 18c70555ad790ca0f8f4dff1f79e4177214f2dd2c25bf06f4cb50a87835be162
Message ID: <32A3BDED.6C81@gte.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961202123721.1459B-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-03 06:04:35 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 22:04:35 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 22:04:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: denial of service and government rights
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961202123721.1459B-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <32A3BDED.6C81@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Black Unicorn wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Dale Thorn wrote:
> > > What you're talking about is contempt of congress.  This is not "fraud."
> > > "I had no idea what I was talking about, but as luck would have it I was
> > > right anyhow." Here, have a bozo button.

> > I was right, and you just can't stand it, can you?  I think the shoe fits
> > you, Mr. Clown, so wear it in "good health".

> Actually, you were not right.  Your claim was that this somehow
> constituted a conspiracy.  I was merely pointing out that even if your
> version of events was correct (which I hardly conceed), you still had no
> clue what you were talking about when you began and just happened to
> "fall" into the answer when your legs were knocked out from under you.

Normally, when someone doesn't know when to give up (you and Sandy S. are
two who come to mind), I just drop it.  But I thought I'd let you know
what I think of your "Argumentum ad Nauseam".  Education is *not* a
substitute for intelligence and common sense, by the way.