1996-12-20 - Re: Executing Encrypted Code

Header Data

From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Message Hash: 37d63db637ff1a5e80fd5f3e43b470817eff294eb2bc08b66bb7c95c6deda6ff
Message ID: <9612202325.AA00944@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: <v02140b08aee0befb6cdb@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-20 23:26:04 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:26:04 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:26:04 -0800 (PST)
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Subject: Re: Executing Encrypted Code
In-Reply-To: <v02140b08aee0befb6cdb@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <9612202325.AA00944@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Peter Hendrickson writes:
>  I would expect software prices to drop because everybody using
>  the software would be paying for it.

I don't mean to sound rude or insult you personally, but this is utterly  
absurd.  If everyone is paying for the software then the company would be  
making even MORE money.  Only a fool would want to make less money!!  If money  
wasn't important to these people they wouldn't be in the business of selling  
software in the first place!

Aside from putting a gun to people's heads, the only thing that lowers prices  
is competition.

>  It is not out of the question for software vendors to sell
>  two versions of the same software.  One is the piracy-free
>  version and the other is the copy-as-much-as-you-can version.
>  I would expect the piracy-free version to be substantially
>  cheaper.

That would render the entire scheme pointless.  It only takes _____ONE_____  
copy of the software to get out for the whole world to pirate it.


andrew





Thread