From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Message Hash: 37d63db637ff1a5e80fd5f3e43b470817eff294eb2bc08b66bb7c95c6deda6ff
Message ID: <9612202325.AA00944@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: <v02140b08aee0befb6cdb@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-20 23:26:04 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:26:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:26:04 -0800 (PST)
To: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Subject: Re: Executing Encrypted Code
In-Reply-To: <v02140b08aee0befb6cdb@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <9612202325.AA00944@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Peter Hendrickson writes:
> I would expect software prices to drop because everybody using
> the software would be paying for it.
I don't mean to sound rude or insult you personally, but this is utterly
absurd. If everyone is paying for the software then the company would be
making even MORE money. Only a fool would want to make less money!! If money
wasn't important to these people they wouldn't be in the business of selling
software in the first place!
Aside from putting a gun to people's heads, the only thing that lowers prices
is competition.
> It is not out of the question for software vendors to sell
> two versions of the same software. One is the piracy-free
> version and the other is the copy-as-much-as-you-can version.
> I would expect the piracy-free version to be substantially
> cheaper.
That would render the entire scheme pointless. It only takes _____ONE_____
copy of the software to get out for the whole world to pirate it.
andrew
Return to December 1996
Return to ““Scott V. McGuire” <svmcguir@syr.edu>”