1996-12-21 - Instruction Sets which are tough to emulate
Header Data
From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9bf73b8b42e9ac8fd60d91f5d1c011da94107a12bfecf2c7005c63493cccb09a
Message ID: <v02140b00aee102e02f71@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-21 03:06:38 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 19:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 19:06:38 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Instruction Sets which are tough to emulate
Message-ID: <v02140b00aee102e02f71@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'm guessing there are a bunch of ways to make a processor hard
to emulate.
For instance, you can make the registers 65 bits wide.
Can anybody think of some more?
Peter Hendrickson
ph@netcom.com
Thread
Return to December 1996
- Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)”
Return to “ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)”
- 1996-12-21 (Fri, 20 Dec 1996 19:06:38 -0800 (PST)) - Instruction Sets which are tough to emulate - ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
- 1996-12-21 (Sat, 21 Dec 1996 07:10:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Instruction Sets which are tough to emulate - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)