From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: a1fab77ebc64ed647857e855d76708084d5ec886cdcc84a8567716eb17cde6cb
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961229170036.12732A-100000@crl7.crl.com>
Reply To: <v03007800aeec96b09112@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-30 01:12:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 17:12:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 17:12:01 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: "Structuring" of Communications a Felony?
In-Reply-To: <v03007800aeec96b09112@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961229170036.12732A-100000@crl7.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Sun, 29 Dec 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
> Unlike Sandy, I'm not a great believer in multi-year bets as an
> epistemological tool....
Tim has misstated my belief. I do think that short- or long-term
bets fulfill a purpose, but it is not an epistemological one.
(Tim, are you thinking of Robin or Nick?) The purpose it serves
is to make pontificators more cautious in the pontifications.
It's easy to gas on about subjects in which you have no economic
stake; we all do that at times. The possiblity of financial loss
or reward, however, encourages temperance.
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Return to December 1996
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”