1996-12-31 - Re: “Structuring” of Communications a Felony?

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: dthorn@gte.net
Message Hash: b233315f75fe290760384443afa30df6f50e4d73f5a616fb506339411ad78906
Message ID: <199612261239.MAA00376@server.test.net>
Reply To: <32C7EE6C.72D1@gte.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-31 19:24:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:24:04 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:24:04 -0800 (PST)
To: dthorn@gte.net
Subject: Re: "Structuring" of Communications a Felony?
In-Reply-To: <32C7EE6C.72D1@gte.net>
Message-ID: <199612261239.MAA00376@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> So how would the courts prosecute if me and (n) number of other
> persons distribute separate pieces of a "binary", i.e., encrypted or
> otherwise?

You could always try it out, and find out :-)  Take a look at:

	http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/export/

several people have used this .sig in the past.  (Returns you the next
3 lines of uuencoded PGP.EXE, sample below).  Perhaps future
structuring of information regs will add new meaning to this.

Adam
--
A protest of the unconsitutional ITAR, a chunk of PGP.EXE:
------------------- PGP.ZIP part [001/713] ------------------
M4$L#!!0````(`">9ZQX3(*,_DG8!`-JF`P`'````4$=0+D581>S;=UQ3U__X
M\9M!$E8,TT@PJ$10$1=*41%WW`KX$=Q[M5KK`&R%(HH+(T.M"S>NME8K=31N
M:A$[K+5(K:O5BE405ZE:1"3?UTW`:K_]\/G\?O_^?CX>3^_-S;GGO,^\`^@W
-------------------------------------------------------------
for next chunk to export --> http://dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/export/





Thread