1996-12-02 - Re: denial of service and government rights

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn)
Message Hash: e51ed888d0f55610a1ce376041df3e133bfd94a19313676c655c902ebb8c24b8
Message ID: <199612020456.WAA00652@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <32A22FE8.2A1D@gte.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-02 04:38:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 20:38:41 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 20:38:41 -0800 (PST)
To: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn)
Subject: Re: denial of service and government rights
In-Reply-To: <32A22FE8.2A1D@gte.net>
Message-ID: <199612020456.WAA00652@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Mr Thorn wrote:
> Black Unicorn wrote:
> > Fraud is an excellent answer because it is a meaningless answer.  Fraud is
> > traditionally used to prosecutue those not-quite-a-crime cases because the
> > definition essentially comes down to : "That guy did something we don't
> > like."
> [much drivel snipped]
> So what you're saying is I (or we) can testify in front of Congress on
> essentially any topic, telling a blatant lie (that we know is false, and
> which they will subsequently prove is false), and totally get away with
> it.  You and I can do that, is that what you're saying?

     (I am going to spell this wrong) Perjury. 

Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>