From: OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Message Hash: 52f588f92944f8c3c8ea541b07f6e27817d1a7e541006bcb49ec124ac83426cf
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.970130003802.12600A-100000@pegasus.montclair.edu>
Reply To: <199701300447.FAA16712@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-30 06:01:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 22:01:17 -0800 (PST)
From: OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 22:01:17 -0800 (PST)
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Subject: Re: A comment on the censorship policy
In-Reply-To: <199701300447.FAA16712@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.970130003802.12600A-100000@pegasus.montclair.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> I cannot understand how some of my (accurate) criticisms of Sandfort's
> censorhip polices---some in direct response to his own self-serving posts
> declaring himself not to be a flamer himself---are not making it to the
> "New and Improved Censored List," while inane posts from Toto, Thorn, and
> someone named "Nurdane Oksas" are appearing.
WEll....that's not so bad ;)
> (Oksas has the especially annoying habit of quoting entire posts and then
> appending a one-line piece of completely list-irrelevant fluff. Also,
Is it so annoying...? why did you read it to that point??? :)
Why could you not be so anonymous and tell me? My posts are
a bit brief; Blancs' are far better, next time read hers.
> engaging in lovey-dovey posts with Vulis, who writes messages about how he
> longs to see Oksas naked.)
Huh?? You are being a 'fluff' here ;)
> This whole process is showing the worst of Sandfort's censorship policy.
>
> (If this is dumped into the "Not suitable for Cypherpunks to read" list, I
> urge those of you who see it to pass it on to the main list.)
>
> END
>
> --
>
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”