From: OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:35:55 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: A comment on the censorship policy
In-Reply-To: <7Zoc2D4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.970130133328.25609A-100000@pegasus.montclair.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu> writes:
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> > > I cannot understand how some of my (accurate) criticisms of Sandfort's
> > > censorhip polices---some in direct response to his own self-serving posts
> > > declaring himself not to be a flamer himself---are not making it to the
> > > "New and Improved Censored List," while inane posts from Toto, Thorn, and
> > > someone named "Nurdane Oksas" are appearing.
> > 
> > 	WEll....that's not so bad ;)
> 
> I find Oksas's posts to be very interesting.  

	Thank you.

> > > (Oksas has the especially annoying habit of quoting entire posts and then
> > > appending a one-line piece of completely list-irrelevant fluff. Also,
> > 	Is it so annoying...? why did you read it to that point??? :)
> > 	Why could you not be so anonymous and tell me?  My posts are
> > 	a bit brief; Blancs' are far better, next time read hers.
> > 
> > > engaging in lovey-dovey posts with Vulis, who writes messages about how he
> > > longs to see Oksas naked.)
> > 
> > 	Huh??  You are being a 'fluff' here ;)
> 
> "Anonymous" is lying - I never posted any such thing.  of course the
> cocksuckr moderator passed on the "anon's" lies to the censored mailing
> list, and I bet he's goingto auto-bounce my refutation to "flames"
> - just as everyone had predicted.

	Anonymous is a jerk.
> > 	
	Best Regards,

	OKSAS