1997-01-15 - Re: Newt’s phone calls

Header Data

From: Brian Lane <nexus@eskimo.com>
To: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Message Hash: 612aedd6b28adc7a97316ffb1d498626a1d92c29faf0d6be7f1656115bd3c050
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970115075526.2682E-100000@fozzy.islet.com>
Reply To: <199701150307.TAA18846@slack.lne.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-15 16:01:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 08:01:05 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Brian Lane <nexus@eskimo.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 08:01:05 -0800 (PST)
To: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Subject: Re: Newt's phone calls
In-Reply-To: <199701150307.TAA18846@slack.lne.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970115075526.2682E-100000@fozzy.islet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 14 Jan 1997, Eric Murray wrote:

> Clay Olbon II writes:
> > 
> > The congressman (Boehner? from Ohio) whose cellphone was "eavesdropped"
> > stated today that he was parked in the lot of a Waffle House in Lake City
> > FL.  The couple said that they just happened to be driving by when they
> > overheard and began taping the conversation.
> 
> Interesting.  In California, operating a scanner while driving is illegal.
> Of course it was probably the passenger running the scanner.

  Actually in Florida its illegal to even have a scanner in your car!
These folks have broken several state and federal laws, as well as the
congressman who leaked it to the newspapers instead of turning it over to
the head of the Ethics committe as he should have. Everyone involved here
is, or should be, in deep yogurt.

  I don't like the laws they passed, but since they passed them I want to
see them enforce them to the full extent posible. Then maybe people will
start to wonder why the transmission wasn't encrypted. Which also leads to
another question. How much information is in the clear from congressmen
and government employees who are clueless about the security of their
cellphones, cordless phones, etc?

  Brian


----
  www.eskimo.com/~nexus      Nexus Computing     ftp.eskimo.com/~nexus






Thread