1997-01-25 - Re: [No Subject:]

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6c13714b540d1ae458c3dbb84f165fcac6d50e0a72e534275e05193d8c62683c
Message ID: <NZc41D33w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <19970125.091136.3254.4.SATAN_is_a_HACKER@juno.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-25 14:50:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 06:50:07 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 06:50:07 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [No Subject:]
In-Reply-To: <19970125.091136.3254.4.SATAN_is_a_HACKER@juno.com>
Message-ID: <NZc41D33w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


satan_is_a_hacker@juno.com (Lou Zer) writes:

>
> On Sat, 25 Jan 1997 00:30:57 -0800 Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
> writes:
> >Hi!  It's useful to include a subject line in email so people
> >can decide whether to read it and have more context for it,
> >though calling yourself "fuck you" will probably deter a few people.
> >There are lots of anarchists on the net; you can run into some good
> >discussions on Usenet on several newsgroups with "anarchy" or
> >"anarchism"
> >in the titles.  Rec.caves has good underground material......
>
> You missed the hole point. You read that BECAUSE their was no header, if
> it was ANARCHY you would have just deleted it.

A logical conclusion is that rather than specifying no subject header,
you must specify one that's most likely to get the readers to read it,
not necessarily related to the contents. I suggest the subject
                         $$$ MANE.MONEY.FAST $$$
unless you do write about John Gilmore's PGP MLM scam.

P.S. Is the "hole point" another nickname for Sandy's orifice?

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread