1997-01-11 - Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 78e8c8183b7d66295f49ee23e62adb7c9c5ac021e6e79b789ff916a26d8934ed
Message ID: <32D7D8CA.3ADF@gte.net>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970111003625.0069d61c@mail.io.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-11 18:52:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:52:00 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:52:00 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970111003625.0069d61c@mail.io.com>
Message-ID: <32D7D8CA.3ADF@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Greg Broiles wrote:
> At 10:49 PM 1/10/97 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:

> I think that the human moderator solution suffers less from these problems;
> in general, it's a well-tested solution to the "what about off-topic
> assholes?" problem. It's not perfect, but it does work, more or less; it's
> easy to understand, easy to implement, and requires no software changes on
> the users' end.

Yeah, Greg, we all hate those pesky asshole-types.  But what do you do,
Greg, when the *moderator* is the pesky asshole-type?  Bend over, huh?







Thread