From: Bryce <bryce@digicash.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:31:56 -0800 (PST)
To: Alan Olsen <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
Subject: Re: NETLINK_IPSEC
In-Reply-To: <199702111411.GAA19349@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199702112231.XAA26149@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> Has anyone tried IPSEC with the 2.1.x kernels?  Are there a logcation that
> describes the differences between 2.0.x and 2.1.x?  (I have not been able to
> find one...)  Then again, I have yet to find a list of what was fixed from
> kernel to kernel...  (Probibly in some directory of the tar file...)


Source 1:  ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/kcs

Source 2:  The patch files.  :-)


Regards,

Bryce, not a kernel hacker

PGP sig follows




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2

iQB1AwUBMwDzRUjbHy8sKZitAQE5OQL/X/Uv6oIJTQqWsVzRVTF8slnMBZa9sByj
ld4mHGvfn7lwQXmdWk7OOngRWum38ZysjRxRk7R5OtULhRsUxRjIe2FhTXFn3v/O
nKxHOTmbbwvz/flovkg7cUFeIk/7iCEl
=ucy1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----