From: Alan Olsen <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:11:45 -0800 (PST)
To: Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@veriweb.com>
Subject: Re: NETLINK_IPSEC
Message-ID: <199702111411.GAA19349@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 04:21 PM 2/7/97 -0800, Jeremey Barrett wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>When running 'make modules', NETLINK_IPSEC and IPFWD_NOTTLDEC are
>undeclared. I added NETLINK_IPSEC to include/net/netlink.h,
>but IPFWD_NOTTLDEC is not to be found. I'm running kernel 2.0.0,
>the INSTALL.txt file in the ipsec distribution mentions 2.0.24,
>is that the minimum kernel to run on?

Is there any specific reason for staying with the 2.0.0 kernel?  (I would
think you would want to upgrade just for the "Ping O' Death" fix alone.)

Has anyone tried IPSEC with the 2.1.x kernels?  Are there a logcation that
describes the differences between 2.0.x and 2.1.x?  (I have not been able to
find one...)  Then again, I have yet to find a list of what was fixed from
kernel to kernel...  (Probibly in some directory of the tar file...)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5

iQEVAwUBMvytcOQCP3v30CeZAQHL5gf/RVBzl8nunBPg7wCiS4qGSo+M/BsBrBNM
bKowgWaZI5UNtMgmxnxadrd7O6uvQv15+U9XO5qhbXNKm0ZoDpBF1hLY4jk2sx4i
AH3VQE2YQayIkMbYMvjA7A4tYyXEay8KwGKgqYLsVkhMQ2HDo7CFS6xwD3N5jJ7V
Ln/GWLfhd6uK3sPtWYkX6BcM0gNs2l6gJOojcfwghqwgXGVc4ooY8SyWweJgT4OK
lGQNmzEeNDDCRXfa6pE5BnSYeAgRPqPvltIwgutpcVGq3KPJ0UuiTHpiYt7A+GYa
yT6r+IN9T6O/ws53dUAlIJZZ73cG1Me6Q15z/8uLbzD7WsAP6ifWVw==
=pZed
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---
|            "Mi Tio es infermo, pero la carretera es verde!"            |
|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer:         |
| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!"  | Ignore the man      |
|`finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key  | behind the keyboard.|
|         http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/       |alan@ctrl-alt-del.com|