1997-02-07 - Re: lead remailer is shut down
Header Data
From: Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Message Hash: 06981c68be733fbab422978b4cfdcf2cab6719b64e2e69973ff87b3397635c2d
Message ID: <199702071958.LAA18779@peregrine.eng.sun.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 19:59:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:59:27 -0800 (PST)
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Subject: Re: lead remailer is shut down
Message-ID: <199702071958.LAA18779@peregrine.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards? I.e. no mass
crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?
Thread
Return to February 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to “Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)”
Return to “lutz@as-node.jena.thur.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)”
- 1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:59:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)
- 1997-02-09 (Sun, 9 Feb 1997 05:38:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - lutz@as-node.jena.thur.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-02-11 (Mon, 10 Feb 1997 20:00:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>