1997-02-09 - Re: lead remailer is shut down
Header Data
From: lutz@as-node.jena.thur.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
To: Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)
Message Hash: f4bde459a7e995eec9487ac6468434bba895a1ade8750e94474b242c7372d782
Message ID: <m0vtXHn-0003tuC@as-node.jena.thur.de>
Reply To: <199702071958.LAA18779@peregrine.eng.sun.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-09 13:38:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 05:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: lutz@as-node.jena.thur.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 05:38:57 -0800 (PST)
To: Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)
Subject: Re: lead remailer is shut down
In-Reply-To: <199702071958.LAA18779@peregrine.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <m0vtXHn-0003tuC@as-node.jena.thur.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
* Ed Falk wrote:
> Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards? I.e. no mass
> crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?
Yes, thay can, but using PGP is enough to filter out the majority of spammers.
--
| Lutz Donnerhacke +49/3641/380259 voice, -60 ISDN, -61 V.34 und Fax |
Thread
Return to February 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to “Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)”
Return to “lutz@as-node.jena.thur.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)”
- 1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:59:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - Ed.Falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk)
- 1997-02-09 (Sun, 9 Feb 1997 05:38:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - lutz@as-node.jena.thur.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-02-11 (Mon, 10 Feb 1997 20:00:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>