1997-02-04 - Re: Moderation [Tim,Sandy]

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 46beac7f8db1fae93d2475224a8f7367f6d3f7e25d42336875a96dff89572960
Message ID: <199702040258.UAA02235@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <199702032011.MAA01053@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-04 02:40:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 18:40:55 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 18:40:55 -0800 (PST)
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: Moderation [Tim,Sandy]
In-Reply-To: <199702032011.MAA01053@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199702040258.UAA02235@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I believe that Cypherpunks is beyond hope of recovery. In fact, each day
> Cypherpunk (as in cypherpunks@toad.com) lives on, it does damage to the
> cause. Let's kill the list. Once and for all. Let the hard core crypto go
> to Coderpunks, the politics to Cryptography, and the garbage into the void.

    Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't(wasn't) there an implied threat of 
moderation on the cryptography@c2.net list? Mr. M started it with the intent
of getting away from much of the cruft (ADD, & etc.) that had accumlated 
here, and he was quite open about moderating it if he thought it needed it.






Thread