From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d02e77b91e058c90d92d15267d79ad9d81c23d400104744b3eada04f6db4cbc2
Message ID: <199702032011.MAA01053@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-03 20:11:35 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:35 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Moderation [Tim,Sandy]
Message-ID: <199702032011.MAA01053@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Since it seems to be the topic of the day, here are some of my thoughts on
moderating CP.
o Moderation achieved what it could achieve. Spam is no longer clogging up
the list. Insults, i.e., "Tim Mayo fucks children", are no longer polluting
the list.
o Moderation did not achieve what it couldn't achieve. The level of noise
has been reduced, but signal has not been increased. This is sad, but true.
The attempt was probably bound to fail, since many of the "top signal
generators" have long left the list and are not about to come back. All
that is remaining are a few diehards, such as myself, some TLA goons
(knowingly or unknowingly) working against the cause, and many newbies and
observers.
I believe that Cypherpunks is beyond hope of recovery. In fact, each day
Cypherpunk (as in cypherpunks@toad.com) lives on, it does damage to the
cause. Let's kill the list. Once and for all. Let the hard core crypto go
to Coderpunks, the politics to Cryptography, and the garbage into the void.
I am well aware of the name recognition and reputation capital associated
with CP, still I believe it best to *kill the list*.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
"I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and
violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi
Return to February 1997
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”