1997-05-13 - Re: `careerpunks’

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 15431ea1542e8c5747d7257fd2b6a699224720c202c41f06f8fea06da4bd7008
Message ID: <199705131158.HAA20185@homeport.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-13 12:22:39 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 20:22:39 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 20:22:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: `careerpunks'
Message-ID: <199705131158.HAA20185@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Adam Back wrote:
> Seems to me many of the `cypherpunks' have become `careerpunks' and
> are now more interested in trading crypto tips, trade gossip, than in
> cypherpunks projects.
> 
> They went through the phase of buying kewl domain names (take a look
> down the subscriber lists), tinkering with remailers, and have now
> graduated to making money from crypto consulting, and lost interest in
> the issues where they don't add to the bottom line.

	I disagree with your analysis.  I'm working for a number of
large companies as a consultant.  At each of them, I think I've done
things that substantially imrpove customer privacy.  At one, I may
have sold them on role certificates "This certifies that the bearer
can access account 345567734545435."  As opposed to "This is John
Smith."  I think thats a huge win for privacy advocates, and hey, it
saves them work and money to do it this way.  I could not have
convinced these people by posting to cypherpunks.

	Selling your services does not involve selling out.

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread