1997-05-06 - Re: Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer?

Header Data

From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: a883af7968d98ce68979f2c389d9ee84035b9fc15bb0ca157ddb81b8ef73ee8b
Message ID: <199705061935.MAA13079@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-06 22:33:56 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 06:33:56 +0800

Raw message

From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 06:33:56 +0800
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer?
Message-ID: <199705061935.MAA13079@kachina.jetcafe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Igor Chudov writes:
> Dave Hayes wrote:
> > Judgementally speaking, if you spam, you may not continue to condemn
> > spammers and be consistent.
> Let's say, what if instead of spamming Prof. Arachelian hacks Cyberpromo
> and deletes all files there? Would it also be inconsistent, in your
> view?

What makes you think that my view of consistency has anything to do
with this action?
------
Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org 
Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will
pick himself up and continue.








Thread