1997-05-07 - Re: Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer?

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: dave@kachina.jetcafe.org (Dave Hayes)
Message Hash: e46d713c6b10ea28fb176b6f582faadf8e5e57aa76ce95113e553c987728ca17
Message ID: <199705070135.UAA24857@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <199705061935.MAA13079@kachina.jetcafe.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-07 01:49:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 09:49:39 +0800

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 09:49:39 +0800
To: dave@kachina.jetcafe.org (Dave Hayes)
Subject: Re: Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer?
In-Reply-To: <199705061935.MAA13079@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Message-ID: <199705070135.UAA24857@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Dave Hayes wrote:
> 
> Igor Chudov writes:
> > Dave Hayes wrote:
> > > Judgementally speaking, if you spam, you may not continue to condemn
> > > spammers and be consistent.
> > Let's say, what if instead of spamming Prof. Arachelian hacks Cyberpromo
> > and deletes all files there? Would it also be inconsistent, in your
> > view?
> 
> What makes you think that my view of consistency has anything to do
> with this action?

I am interested in your view, Dave.

	- Igor.






Thread