From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 14:04:41 +0800
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Subject: Re: Bypassing the Digicash Patents
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970504183109.02752718@pop.sirius.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970504225450.006fe22c@pop.sirius.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 11:42 PM 5/4/97 EDT, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com> writes:
>> example, most merchants try to get location/contact information when they
>> take a check, because there's some risk that the check will be returned
>> (sometimes in as long as 2-3 weeks) after the customer and the merchandise
is
>> long gone. If checks cleared instantly, this wouldn't be necessary - and I
>> think merchants would forego collecting this information (they do now, for
>
>As usual, Greg the C2Net shill writes total bullshit about things he
>knows nothing about.  Try paying cash at Radio Shack, and see if they
>ask for your name and address for their mailing list.  I guess Greg
>is not the type to buy anything at Radio Shack.  What a fitting
>employee for C2Net.

I avoid Radio Shack as a general rule, because I haven't been pleased with
the quality of their products and I find their privacy-hostile behavior
annoying. But when I have made purchases at Radio Shack, I've had no trouble
with them if I say "This is a cash sale. You don't need my name or address."

But I understand you're considerably less courageous in person than you are
from behind a terminal a few thousand miles away, so it's entirely possible
that a mousy Radio Shack clerk asking for your name does pose a significant
threat to your privacy. I had overlooked the "wimpy nerd" problem in my
earlier message. Thanks for pointing out my oversight. In the future, please
assume that when I mention a hypothetical consumer, I mean one of average or
greater fortitude. Perhaps you can find a friend who's not scared of the
Radio Shack clerks to make your purchases for you?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5

iQEVAgUBM2116P37pMWUJFlhAQEmwwf+LQZaGKOyCOErPlLFo3aRsguix46fhlvS
jYCTc/yTTXObiC5J1IYskaaOpYAmbhtQiSFT+4d8sjhAMteTFVt12gZG0d2RsczT
eHdKthu4NTA6eHPfBjz6C17FcGMaieYXFAbSLHFxFjwVa/g8tN6WHB8IxIG+zPvZ
DVZv4DWsb+SmjQEk0RCs+J5yv2bbAr3lKtXVS7eFzHR9CsaXfIdsq8MisleR+A3u
5ZgRlIdIpDzBEemr32KlL60o8NgcAudLUAimjVb09P6qNmk7A3k+NYwLkaAJrYzk
b+LKyBdoj2opPTiZT1vY3WYEHvpsWpiVJ7yapuNX8r3HlHr+DbNqsA==
=sGw9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Greg Broiles                | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
gbroiles@netbox.com         | 
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.
                            |