From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 5aab3bfdac2327ef6da96d84e22585a0e4662f44f23faf8d2f5092097c951597
Message ID: <v03102808afcb6e1b4e35@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970616140435.25992G-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-16 22:54:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 06:54:32 +0800
From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 06:54:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: ACLU/EPIC: First Amendment Pledge Campaign
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970616140435.25992G-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <v03102808afcb6e1b4e35@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 2:38 PM -0700 6/16/97, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>> ACLU, EPIC Call on Congress and Clinton to
>> "Take the First Amendment Pledge"
>
>The sad thing is that we need them to do it a second time. They already
>made this pledge once before, it's called the oath of office.
>
>If the ingore it after the first time why should they honor it a second
>time?
Indeed, it looks to be just press release jive.
If they "take the pledge" on the First, why not the Second? And all the others?
In any case, they can all take this "pledge" with a clear conscience--not
that I expect many to respond to a PR stunt like this--and say "I do."
After all, their arguments for things like the CDA are not based on
overturning the First Amendment: what they will always claim is that the
law is one of the many "exceptions" to the First Amendment. (There are
many...I presume I don't have to make a list here, do I?)
And will EPIC then withdraw its support of Pro-CODE, which says that
certain forms of speech when used in furtherance of a crime, or to hide a
crime, are criminal? Would EPIC support a law which said that Spanish is
legal to speak or write in the U.S., unless it is used to further or hide a
crime? How about Pig Latin? How about Rot13? How about whispering? How
about RSA?
So, EPIC, why don't _you_ take the First Amendment Pledge and then
immediately withdraw all support for Pro-CODE so long as it contains this
pernicious language criminalizing certain modes of speech?
I didn't think so.
--Tim May
There's something wrong when I'm a felon under an increasing number of laws.
Only one response to the key grabbers is warranted: "Death to Tyrants!"
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Return to June 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”