cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-06-17 - Re: ACLU/EPIC: First Amendment Pledge Campaign

Header Data

From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
To: N/A
Message Hash: fec8a55957052df9a6c5d50144f0bf6686277e1330a1f8ed3d8e834b73b7112f
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970617061005.111H-100000@shirley>
Reply To: <199706162213.RAA24347@mailhub.amaranth.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-17 00:55:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 08:55:15 +0800

Raw message

From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 08:55:15 +0800
Subject: Re: ACLU/EPIC: First Amendment Pledge Campaign
In-Reply-To: <199706162213.RAA24347@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970617061005.111H-100000@shirley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:

[...]

> IMHO I think that we need a trial, similar to the Nuremberg Trials after
> WWII, for the politicians in DC for "High Crimes Against the Constitution
> of the United States".

I don't think it would be a trial,  more likly to be a House committee
doing this.  Infact we need to give this thing a name,  well Crimes
against the constitution is realy an un-american activity.  I know we
could call it the "House committee on UnAmerican Activities".

Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep.  Buy easter bilbies.
Save the ABC Is $0.08 per day too much to pay?  ex-net.scum and prouud     
I'm sorry but I just don't consider 'because its yukky' a convinceing argument

Thread