1997-06-09 - Re: With friends like these…
Header Data
From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
To: nobody@huge.cajones.com
Message Hash: 93b25760b55acf7aef6a4f8dcfd7b58cbfabd42c4724a097de7d9b38d80bebb3
Message ID: <199706092106.OAA18846@slack.lne.com>
Reply To: <199706091928.MAA01854@fat.doobie.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-09 21:27:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 05:27:28 +0800
Raw message
From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 05:27:28 +0800
To: nobody@huge.cajones.com
Subject: Re: With friends like these...
In-Reply-To: <199706091928.MAA01854@fat.doobie.com>
Message-ID: <199706092106.OAA18846@slack.lne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Huge Cajones Remailer writes:
>
>
> I just read www.crypto.com/key_study. I was not impressed. In fact,
> one thing worries me a lot. I think the report basicly sells us out.
[shitload of FUD deleted]
Is there something important coming up that we should know about?
Something big enough to make the FUD-mongers want to distract us?
The main lie in this message was that the report endorses safe/pro-code.
It does not. It doesn't even mention them.
--
Eric Murray ericm@lne.com Privacy through technology!
Network security and encryption consulting. PGP keyid:E03F65E5
Thread
Return to June 1997
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to “Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>”
Return to “nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)”
- 1997-06-09 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 03:41:54 +0800) - With friends like these… - nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
- 1997-06-09 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 05:27:28 +0800) - Re: With friends like these… - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
- 1997-06-09 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 06:46:18 +0800) - Re: With friends like these… - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
- 1997-06-10 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 01:19:11 +0800) - Re: With friends like these… - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>