From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Message Hash: c0835c1841e601fb701024fb21f451f7bca5be60543defc2229a6c631d1b09a6
Message ID: <199706070149.UAA26627@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <199706070142.DAA29774@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-07 02:01:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:01:26 +0800
From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:01:26 +0800
To: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Subject: Re: Who subscribes to the list?
In-Reply-To: <199706070142.DAA29774@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <199706070149.UAA26627@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Anonymous wrote:
>
>
> Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> > Another danger of using remailers without encryption is that it is very
> > easy to compromise one's identity due to little mistakes and malformed
> > messages.
>
> Yup, apparently relay.com and reply.com have gotten quite a bit of
> remailer@replay.com's mail. In fact, relay.com has complained about this
> several times. (Obviously they were reading the misdirected mail.)
>
What do remailer operators think about requiring all incoming messages
to be encrypted? Would that bring more good than harm?
- Igor.
Return to June 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”